cuseguy said:If Grant is indeed leaving, just dawned on me... I guess Roberson could slide over and Johnson plays the 3. But that still doesn't truly solve the problem. I guess it will just remain a problem.
Roberson will be a good midrange shooter. McCullough will be be a better shooter than Grant from day one. The question with McCullough is if he can become consistant with his jumper.Any chance McCullough or Roberson develop a 3 point shot going into next year or will we be looking at a starting lineup with only one capable shooter and massive congestion inside the perimeter again?
Any chance McCullough or Roberson develop a 3 point shot going into next year or will we be looking at a starting lineup with only one capable shooter and massive congestion inside the perimeter again?
Roberson will be a good midrange shooter. McCullough will be be a better shooter than Grant from day one. The question with McCullough is if he can become consistant with his jumper.
Hmmm. With your repeated posts about how poorly McC has played, I just assumed you've seen him play more than once. Did you ever think that he had a poor game, was ill etc. I'll have to take your opinion with a grain of salt .Only one game, but the one time I saw McCullough this year, he took one jumper and it was an airball.
Rak will play zero minutes at the 4.Mix and match.
McCullough 3/4
Roberson 3/4
Rak 4/5
G 2/3
BJ 2/3
The 3 and 4 have options. But I would expect Roberson and McCullough to be 30+.
Rak will play zero minutes at the 4.
We probably have more guys that can play multiple positions than any cuse team I can rememberMix and match.
McCullough 3/4
Roberson 3/4
Rak 4/5
G 2/3
BJ 2/3
The 3 and 4 have options. But I would expect Roberson and McCullough to be 30+.
Lol...so true. I think he also called him a terrible rebounder etc.Hmmm. With your repeated posts about how poorly McC has played, I just assumed you've seen him play more than once. Did you ever think that he had a poor game, was ill etc. I'll have to take your opinion with a grain of salt .
Seen him play as a junior and senior. But it gave me a good idea of his game. We'll see.ORRange said:Hmmm. With your repeated posts about how poorly McC has played, I just assumed you've seen him play more than once. Did you ever think that he had a poor game, was ill etc. I'll have to take your opinion with a grain of salt .
Yes, why?He's not a good rebounder.
Have you seen him play?
The only thing I could say for sure is his athleticism is off the charts. He makes grant look like Elvira ovcina. I really like his length on defense (I felt he played more than most high schoolers). I thought his shooting form looked good. My one negative is that I think he tends to be a watcher of the ball.And what did you think? I don't mind hearing something positive. Lord knows we need to hear something good lately.
AZOrange said:The only thing I could say for sure is his athleticism is off the charts. He makes grant look like Elvira ovcina. I really like his length on defense (I felt he played more than most high schoolers). I thought his shooting form looked good. My one negative is that I think he tends to be a watcher of the ball.