Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Ozcuse, post: 1597684, member: 766"] Your 1st and 2nd place scenario could be statistically possible but I see a much greater chance for allowing cream to rise to the top with no divisions. Removing divisions would also allow for much more balanced scheduling and rotation of conference opponents. Give each team 3-4 protected rivalry games (SU could be Pitt, BC, VT and/or Miami) and then rotate the other 5 so you get a chance to play everyone every 3 years. Why have set named divisions if you're just going to redistribute teams each year? I could see some serious problems trying to balance home and away schedules with new divisional opponents each year. If you switch divisions and a team you are owed a division home game against is now in a different division and the team that replaces them is also owed a home game you're going to get screwed. [/QUOTE]