Orangeyes
R.I.P Dan
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 16,265
- Like
- 21,713
"College basketball players are ready when they're ready." Well duh. The problem isn't whether that statement is true or not. Of course "they're ready when they're ready." The problem is that nobody truly knows when someone is ready, and the NBA doesn't draft based on readiness, they draft based on potential. So the question is do you go while your hot and get the quick payday hoping you'll improve enough to stick around or do you stay in college until you're ready to stick around but risk that you'll cool off in the eyes of the scouts?
I feel like it takes more than a personal trainer for a player to develop. For basketball, a team environment with a focus on improving fundamentals is ideal. The NBA isn't geared toward that and I don't think the D-League has the best resources. Currently, the NCAA is the US's best version of a farm league, although I'll admit it isn't ideal. It won't be until the objective of teams is to develop players rather than win now. I understand when players want to leave early. But I don't think Boeheim is being self serving when he mentions they could use more time in college. When he thinks a player is ready (or it's in his best interest to jump), he'll say so.This leaves unanswered the question: If a player isn't NBA-ready, is he more likely to improve by staying in college or on a professional roster? I suspect the latter. As an NBA pro, he can afford a personal trainer and private coaching, and he has the time (no classes with which to contend) to put all those to good use. To my way of thinking, the only pertinent concern is whether, by entering the draft, said player can secure a guaranteed contract. The only other issue worth mentioning is: Is the player really enjoying the collegiate experience? Running away from happiness has its own set of concerns.
But this leads to the question of how does a player get better? If a guy gets drafted and plays 5 minutes per game, therefore never getting into a flow, and practices during the season are more about installing strategy and not necessarily improving players, would he be better off going back to college? A guy can work on individual skills, but that may not necessarily translate to improved on court play. Contrast that with a guy that plays 35 minutes per game in college getting multiple touches on the offensive end. He has a chance to slump and work out of that slump. He makes mistakes but gets to play through them and make corrections. And his practices in season are geared toward player development.This leaves unanswered the question: If a player isn't NBA-ready, is he more likely to improve by staying in college or on a professional roster? I suspect the latter. As an NBA pro, he can afford a personal trainer and private coaching, and he has the time (no classes with which to contend) to put all those to good use. To my way of thinking, the only pertinent concern is whether, by entering the draft, said player can secure a guaranteed contract. The only other issue worth mentioning is: Is the player really enjoying the collegiate experience? Running away from happiness has its own set of concerns.
Cav you might be right for some players but not all. These kids who leave early are 19-20 years old...in many cases they are the meal ticket for the whole family and a bunch of straphangers.