Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="javadoc, post: 5275978, member: 338"] His own description says that it values doing things well. It's supposed to be able to sort out luck from consistency. I think it must value defense in a way that we did not demonstrate this year. We were good (enough) when our backs were against the wall, which his system may treat as "lucky". But at some point it becomes a pattern and not luck. One thing we did do well was convert 3rd and 4th downs, I think (don't have the numbers in front of me), and that has to be given a ton of weight if your algorithm favors assertiveness and controlling your own destiny. Maybe his algo has meathead baked into it and favors defense (low yards) vs not letting the opposing defense get it in the first place. [/QUOTE]