Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Spring Game Thoughts
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="kingottoiii, post: 273644"] To be fair we are playing guys earlier then they should be ideally playing. Pugh is a guy who shouldn't have started until is RS Soph year. He started as a RS Frosh. Chibane should not have started until is RS JR year. He started as a Soph. Mackey should not have started until his RS JR year. He started as a Soph. Foy/Trudo should not be playing this year as RS Frosh but one will likely start (although it is possible Alexander could end here). Alexander or Hickey will start this year. Which is just about right for both. Our guys have had to start earlier than they really should have. That is part of the issue. Also it takes longer for an OL to turn over. IMO the O we have been running needs a functional OL. Knowing that, was/is it a good idea his first 4 years to run an O like this? Would it have been better to go with a college O and then move toward this O once the OL was turned over (2013) and able to handle it? Also in college you only get players for 4 years. Does running this system make sense when you have an OL that is constantly changing from one year to the next? And knowing that SU has historically struggled to get OL here? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Spring Game Thoughts
Top
Bottom