Stanford looks bad
- Thread starter NYCSUGrad
- Start date
C
creatorsgam
Guest
Anyone catch the announcer, when discussing the projected PAC 12 teams in the tourney, hype strength of schedule? Claiming to not respect the "26-3's" that "plays cupcakes?" He couldn't seriously be talking about...
NYCSUGrad
All Conference
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
- Messages
- 2,643
- Like
- 2,416
creatorsgame said:
That's more precisely accurate about that 30-0 team. Which is an accomplishment and they may well go far in the tourney, but so far they haven't been tested. But yeah he certainly could be a brain dead tool and mean us.
jncuse
I brought the Cocaine to the White House
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2012
- Messages
- 19,588
- Like
- 33,330
Maybe he was referring to Steve Austin... I am sure it was a shot at Syracuse.
One of the annoying things about this year is when they ask pro conference announcers how many teams will make the tourney. They always overrate their own conference, and some of the teams they say have a decent chance are just ridiculous. The tournament would be about 85 teams large if we took the analysis of an announcer from each conference.
Although one thing I have noted this year, is that many people (and some here) are saying every conference is overrated, and based on their analysis there would be about 55 teams in the tourney. You know the no way this confernece gets more than 3 type.. well we have to get 68.
The bubble is weak this year... but interesting.