Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
State DOT releases plans for three new tunnel options that could replace elevated I-81
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="sutomcat, post: 1040436, member: 27"] I suspect Ottomets is right and the powers that be are at least leaning hard towards the cheapest solutions to the problem, which means the tunnel options are being all but discounted. I hope that when the solutions are debated, they take into account the long term costs for each solution, as well as safety. Given the harsh winter environment in CNY, the elevated highway options are going to have huge on going costs to continually re-build the roads as they get destroyed by snow, ice, salt and the extreme temperature changes that the roads are subjected to. They erode at a significantly faster rate than normal roads because they are exposed from above and below. The sunken highway option also ends up with significantly higher day to day costs, a little less than an elevated highway, because of all the new bridges required to allow traffic to flow over the highway east and west. With a tunnel solution, all that goes away. You don't have to salt it, you don't have to plow it, and it is almost completely shielded from the primary causes of erosion and deterioration. It should last much longer and be far easier to maintain, even given that tunnels surely have some extra realatively maintenance costs for fans, etc. When you take this into account, and take into account all the prime real estate that is freed when you opt for a tunnel based solution, I am not sure the true long term cost for a tunnel based solution is really going to be higher. Couple that with the safety gains (anyone who has driven in the winter on elevated highways knows they are the most dangerous stretches of highway that exist); a tunnel, protected from all elements of winter, should be if anything safer than a normal stretch of highway, at least in the winter where even a white out is not a problem, I think a tunnel based solution starts to make a lot of sense. Not a fan of the 4 billion dollar Eastern tunnel proposal, that one sounds like the cost could well double over time and the pricetag is too high even now to look at seriously. But the relatively shallow cut and cover type tunnels they are proposing should be relatively straightforward to get done and I don't see great risk in cost overruns. Would love to see cost estimates for all the solutions but right now, this is where I am leaning. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
State DOT releases plans for three new tunnel options that could replace elevated I-81
Top
Bottom