Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Statistical Matchup vs #2 Clemson
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="TheCusian, post: 2336284, member: 2585"] So in looking at these numbers as I was putting this together, couple of things stand out if we want to see any kind of archilles heel in an otherwise dominant team: 1. Their D is nasty and elite. There is no chink in the armor, really. Only thing that you can point to is Dungey running (he's no Jackson, but they had some trouble with him) and tempo tiring them out on the road. It's not much. 2. Their O is not the same as last season. Watson was amazing and they don't have anyone like him on the roster. They have been leaning heavily on running the ball with their QB (who may be injured) and a pretty good RB corp. They are really efficient, but lack the explosive plays they had last year... 3. Our D is pretty efficient, esp on 3rd down. So, if we limit the big plays and are as stout as we have been, we'll give ourselves a some chances to get the ball back. Throw in a TO or two? Maybe we're 1 or 2 scores away in the 4th. 4. Like I said, I don't see any chinks in the D. But maybe Babers and Dungey can make some magic happen. If they coach like we did vs LSU on O (not scared, some well-thought our special plays at the right times) - and Dungey rolls out some VaTech grit? 5. Babers said the goal vs LSU was to keep it close in the 4th and then out-endurance them. Maybe that works here if we don't get down by too much. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Statistical Matchup vs #2 Clemson
Top
Bottom