Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="manleyzoo, post: 2969928, member: 519"] It's not anabolic steroids for a whole lot of reasons but right at the top of the list is he'd have to have been on a 6-weeks cycle at minimum, halfway through there would have been noticeable changes in his lean muscle mass and size. That didn't happen. The second reason is steroids would not have helped stabilize or strengthen his ankle, which is a fair assumption of why he would have done it. I've written a lot in another thread that the likely substance is HGH but it's been pointed out that it can't be detected in urine tests, which is what the university would be using to check. For my money, weed just doesn't make sense. [/QUOTE]