Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
Stop making non P5 teams 1 seeds
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="jncuse, post: 1345913, member: 1969"] [B]"BE Flamng Out"[/B] If you look at seedings (and consider the fact that Georgetown was a ridiculous 4), you only expected this confernce to get 1-2 teams in the sweet 16. They (other than Nova) were in seed positions that tend to fall out. So I don't look at the tourney as a total failure per se. It was within the range of expectations. In my view, a big part of the problem is that just because 2 conferences have 6 teams in the tourney some don't separate the mix of the 6 teams and proceed to make flawed conclusions from it. Just because a conference has 6 teams in it, it may only have 1 really good team. a) The ACC does better than the Big East (both with 6 teams) it does not necessarily mean the Big East Sucks, or that the ACC should have had more teams, or the Big East less teams. b) Mix matters. The ACC is a top heavy league -- of course they are going to get more teams in the sweet 16. They have the better teams. A better comparable for them to the Big 12 -- and the ACC did better. A conference that is deep in the middle should theoretically not excel in the round of 32. c) For someome to state that Nova would go 10-8 in the ACC based on this is simply incorrect. Would they go 16-2. Nope, but they are Kenpom #5 -- it's a good team. Let's game back to the point of seeding via KP (as a check of how good the seeding was / any gaming) Using KenPom as a test of gaming the RPI, that system says as of now Villanova 2 Butler 5 Xavier 6 Georgetown 7 Providence 8 St; John's 11 so overall they were maybe over-seeded by 1 line -- and I attribute that to the multiplier effect of having 60% of your teams tourney worthy... The difference was more pronouned with the MwC. Although in 2013 when they got 5 teams in they may have deserved it. B [B] "Only 2 OOC quality wins"[/B] Off the top of my head I know they had neutral court Wins over UNC, Notre Dame, and VCU based on prior research. And they also beat Oklahoma. I am sure there are victories on lower seed lines and many against teams on the "bubble". It looks not that great, but for a 10 team league it's strong. [B]"If Iowa St had won the first game" [/B] If Nova had won the second game. If Butler had beat Notre Dame instead of losing in OT. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
Stop making non P5 teams 1 seeds
Top
Bottom