Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Cheriehoop, post: 5690619, member: 127"] He was setting her up for a job that was held by someone else, had her report to him alone and put her in charge of sports that someone else was in charge of while having both of them report to him. It was undermining the goals and mission of the athletic department, setting up conflict, undermining authority, purposely causing dissonance within SU athletics. The exact opposite definition of leadership. Kent did this all to SU while he was planning his own retirement and probably working under the table with Michigan regarding his new Presidential position there . He was on the ACC’s executive committee regarding the ACC’s future, making decisions etc - now he’ll be one of the Big 10 leaders. Hmm [/QUOTE]