Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Cusefan95, post: 5695022, member: 173"] 1000% agree on this statement. And this is why the folks critical of JW generally just don’t get it. We had a guy near the end of his career with personal emotional investment in SU who was willing to deal with the dysfunction and having his hands tied on key decisions because he felt he could still have a positive impact. The likelihood of that happening again is very, very low. Anyone with any career ambitions is going to bounce fast (like Coyle), anyone who stays is almost certainly going to be a snake oil salesman (like Gross). I’m skeptical Kent was the cause of the dysfunction - it’s gone on long enough that it appears deeply embedded in the culture, processes, and personnel at the university. Maybe I’m wrong and it’ll start to improve now…but I think us longing for the good ole days of Wildhack seven or eight years in the future is far more likely. [/QUOTE]