Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Cusefan95, post: 5696640, member: 173"] I think there’s three possibilities: 1). This was a puff piece to try to mitigate some of the damage of the DO article and help in her efforts in finding future employment. 2). This was a trial balloon to see just how bad the damage is, and if hiring her is still viable. Fairly clear at this point it is not, and Syracuse will dodge a bullet. 3). The decision was already made to hire her, this was to try to set her up for success and they are going full steam ahead in spite of how poorly the article landed. I think #1 is most likely by a lot, #2 is a slight possibility - and if it ends up being #3 it’ll prove Syracuse is even more dysfunctional than I thought. [/QUOTE]