Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="BlazeOrange, post: 184072, member: 683"]
Here's what's in the article:
"[I]The Big East is hastily preparing for the possible departure of West Virginia with contingency plans that would [U][B]allow[/B][/U] league rivals to play Big East opponent twice this season, [U][B]once as a non-conference game[/B][/U], to fill the late scheduling voids.[/I]"
 
Now, if that's all it is, I'm fine with it. Let the schools in the league discuss among themselves who they'll play and where.  If some schools can fill their schedules without doubling up, thats fine - this would just be an option to use if needed.  But if the BE is assigning these non-conference games and venues to its members, I have a major problem with that. The article alludes that there are multiple plans floating around and only mentions the SU-RU option - anyone seen a link with more information?
 
More importantly, is there any confirmation of this quote:
"[I]Syracuse and Pittsburgh, both bound for the ACC, are unable to follow suit immediately because the ACC football schedule has been set already for next season[/I]. "
 
Last I saw, no one had thrown in the towel on a 2012 move yet (but most are in the windup).
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?