SU OR USC | Syracusefan.com

SU OR USC

2

20Plus

Guest
USC only has one bad loss Arizona State but only has two Good wins UCLA and SMU
Their road wins are a joke
San Diego
SW Missouri State,
Oregon state
Colorado
Washington road and neutral
Washington state

The strength of schedule is worse than ours by 40 spot 77
Their BPI is 59
 
USC only has one bad loss Arizona State but only has two Good wins UCLA and SMU
Their road winds are a joke
San Diego
SW Missouri State,
Oregon state
Colorado
Washington road and neutral
Washington state

The strength of schedule is worse than ours by 40 spot
My concern is are they only going to put three teams in from the pac- 12
 
18 wins against teams 100 plus in the rpi, its us by a good amount.
 
My concern is are they only going to put three teams in from the pac- 12
If there's only 3 good teams than there is only 3 good teams. The committee shouldn't say, "Well we only have 3 PAC-12 teams in the tourney so we have to add one more."
 
If there's only 3 good teams than there is only 3 good teams. The committee shouldn't say, "Well we only have 3 PAC-12 teams in the tourney so we have to add one more."

The bottom of the pac 10 is awful, Wash, Ore st, Wash st, there are some really bad teams. Look at the Acc. Pitt finished 14th and beat Md, Marq,Uva, Fsu, and was in the bubble discussion until the last couple weeks of the season.
 
It's us or KState. USC is in. Unfortunately, KState is too.
 
The 2 other teams mentioned in here dont have the quality wins we have. That seemed to be the logic last year, and somehow it changed this year. I think it is very similar to a ref making a "make up call", to try to even things out(for last season). Vitale and Bilas strongly spoke out about it, along with others. The people mocking the Cuse are mostly espnU nobodies, out of whom Ive seen so far!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
169,600
Messages
4,841,188
Members
5,981
Latest member
SYRtoBOS

Online statistics

Members online
286
Guests online
1,453
Total visitors
1,739


...
Top Bottom