VaBeachOrFan
2nd String
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2011
- Messages
- 624
- Like
- 825
Here's a thought on why our supposed offensive rebounding problem isn't what it seems:
Most all of KSU's shots were contested. I only remember a couple of times when a State player got totally free on the wing for an open shot. So what if their guys got two and three offensive rebounds when each one led to yet another contested shot and the ball didn't go in? So what if, say, their fourth shot did go in? All that means is that they shot 25% and only scored two points but racked up three rebounds in doing so. Great for the stat sheet, but little impact on the game. How much did that cost the Orange when we'd make that back with one steal or charge or block? Bottom line: Rebounding disparity is (dare I use that word?) OVERRATED!-VBOF
Most all of KSU's shots were contested. I only remember a couple of times when a State player got totally free on the wing for an open shot. So what if their guys got two and three offensive rebounds when each one led to yet another contested shot and the ball didn't go in? So what if, say, their fourth shot did go in? All that means is that they shot 25% and only scored two points but racked up three rebounds in doing so. Great for the stat sheet, but little impact on the game. How much did that cost the Orange when we'd make that back with one steal or charge or block? Bottom line: Rebounding disparity is (dare I use that word?) OVERRATED!-VBOF