OrangeXtreme
The Mayor of Dewitt
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 232,223
- Like
- 422,488
61 returning / 19 newbies
Agree it is not a good situation. I think we will see a couple of players currently considered WRs or RBs moved to LB or CB. That would help balance things out considerably.That roster makeup is a mess. Really zero excuse for it in year 5.
Only 32/80 are upperclassmen
34/80 are Freshmen/Redshirt Freshman
Could be a long year for a team that young.
IMO we do not have enough QBs, upperclassmen OL, upperclassmen DEs, not enough DTs, not enough LBs (position has been an issue for years), not enough CBs, too many RBs, and too many WRs.
Whole roster seems out of whack.
That’s what happens when your first class or two doesn’t really shake out especially after some bad years before babers came here. I think it’s more encouraging then discouraging with the youth. Last year and this year are gonna be huge for setting up the next 4 years of bowl games
by my rough count we'll have:
13 seniors
19 juniors
14 sophomores
14 red-shirt freshman
24 newbies (mostly true freshman depending on if we add any jucos)
Small-ish senior class but doesn't seem to far off from normal, no ?
17 seniors doesn’t really happen due to attrition along the way.Well 17 x 5 would be perfect balance. Our SR and Sophomore classes look small.
That roster makeup is a mess. Really zero excuse for it in year 5.
Only 32/80 are upperclassmen
34/80 are Freshmen/Redshirt Freshman
Could be a long year for a team that young.
IMO we do not have enough QBs, upperclassmen OL, upperclassmen DEs, not enough DTs, not enough LBs (position has been an issue for years), not enough CBs, too many DEs, too many RBs, and too many WRs.
Whole roster seems out of whack.
Well 17 x 5 would be perfect balance. Our SR and Sophomore classes look small.
But it’s a lot harder to achieve that these days, with more early defections, more career ending injuries and the 4 game redshirt rule.
Bigger issue are the few positions you all have noted. QB is light, DT is light, and WR is heavy due to a bunch being recruited over but still taking a roster spot.
We should be bringing in over 20 freshman every year. Even if you lose 25% of that class you have 15+. And that doesn’t include guys transferring in. I don’t think 17 is hard to achieve.
Are we really still blaming Shafer in year 5?I'm not arguing about the roster balance - I largely agree. But when you analyze the 'why' I think some things stand out. A large part of the imbalance was the 23 Shafer kids departing the team during their careers. More specifically 16 of 26 kids in the sophomore and redshirt classes from HCDB first year in 2016.
Are we really still blaming Shafer in year 5?
There also have been a number of players medically DQ during the past 4 years.I'm not arguing about the roster balance - I largely agree. But when you analyze the 'why' I think some things stand out. A large part of the imbalance was the 23 Shafer kids departing the team during their careers. More specifically 16 of 26 kids in the sophomore and redshirt classes from HCDB first year in 2016.
A handful every year. Another handful only see ST and occasional mop-up duty. If they’re smart they’ll use their time on the Hill to get their degree. For some of these it is injury related, others are coaches’ gambles that didn’t pan out and others are over-recruited the following year and thus miss their window of opportunity.Every time a roster is mentioned I bring this up but blows my mind these teams have 85 players.
How many players are here four years and just never see the field?
Riley messed us up at 3 positions last year as a senior. He was bad at kickoff returns, especially bad at punt returns, and terrible as a slot receiverA handful every year. Another handful only see ST and occasional mop-up duty. If they’re smart they’ll use their time on the Hill to get their degree. For some of these it is injury related, others are coaches’ gambles that didn’t pan out and others are over-recruited the following year and thus miss their window of opportunity.
Every time a roster is mentioned I bring this up but blows my mind these teams have 85 players.
How many players are here four years and just never see the field?
Interesting stuff. Never heard of those names you mentioned who played this year.I actually considered this when scanning the rosters but it's hard to quantify because of Special Teams and Garbage time. Trotter will be a junior and saw 6 games this year but he's one you can say has never seen the field yet. DuWayne Johnson (a SR) is another (10 games and 10 tackles but not really).
Most kids not playing are either A) injured, or B) underclassmen. Of the entire senior class - excluding walkons - I counted 3 that just didn't see the field. DJohnson noted above, Grosvenur and Duerig.
Every single junior is seeing the field and impacting except for Heckle (hurt), Mike Clark (dnp in 18 & 19) and Devon Clarke (though 8 games played) and has a chance to earn a starting spot in 2020.
Figure a 2-deep comprises nearly half the team.
There also have been a number of players medically DQ during the past 4 years.
Agreed. Reducing CFB rosters to 75 or so would seemingly also aid the sport's parity issue.Every time a roster is mentioned I bring this up but blows my mind these teams have 85 players.
How many players are here four years and just never see the field?