Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Scooch, post: 5352448, member: 628"] I agree that pile-ons aren't useful or all that interesting. In this case though, we're talking about why this program completely and utterly failed at the PG spot. So I think it's fine for folks to push back on the idea that Westry was part of some "reasonably considered" plan. The staff knew, they literally told people, that any contribution from Westry this season would be a bonus. They knew that before they brought in Petar. So they clearly felt Carlos at the 1 was fine, good enough, or whatever. [/QUOTE]