Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="OrangeMuskyFish, post: 111508, member: 261"] In a rant in another post, this is exactly what I mention as my pet peeve. If we are going to get nuts about a "lack of talent," can we at least qualify what exactly that means? At WR for instance, obviously being fast isn't enough, or Rutgers would be putting 40 on the board every Saturday. If you are talking about making plays and catching the damn ball, then Lemon is better than the Rutgers options, and I HARDLY think that is a tradeoff these folk are leaning towards. So, aside from Calvin Johnson, what exactly is it we need at the WR position? [/QUOTE]