Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="HtownOrange, post: 5312220, member: 622"]
Just a reminder that a bad reputation takes longer to recover from than the destruction of the former reputation.  In short, what we are seeing now may be the longer term repercussions from the diminutive one.  Additionally, the trustees would need to look at the infrastructure, academic, no physical plant, developed under the Chancellor's leadership.  I know he wanted a medical facility and has to scale it back.  I also recall he wanted to expand the engineering and other STEM offerings and research, both of which are necessary to meet future needs of the country and any long term strategy for a university, especially when many degrees are overpriced to begin with.  Recall, kids being recruited today as students will not graduate until 2030 or later if pursuing advanced degrees.

I have no inside information on the internal academics matters being addressed by KS, though, I am sure  the BOT would have detailed information.  If he has placed SU on a solid footing, then I would expect him to be able to stay on for a while.   If not, I would expect the BOT to search out new candidates in a timely manner.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?