Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 1820085, member: 1969"] Very practical recommendation that makes sense. Also noted this farther down... could this be the end of the RPI as a key metric for indicating quality of wins? While they have already minimized the RPI as a standalone number, it is still heavily relied upon for determinining quality wins. Sometimes it works, sometimes it fails. While the PAC12 certainly did not try to game the system lasr year, it's RPI numbers were much better then say those under KenPom. When they were seeded based on the strength of the # of top 50 wins, many predicted they would fail to perform to the seed line. And that is ultimately what happened. [ATTACH=full]70001[/ATTACH] I also heard some coaches recommended to a live feed torture of Joe Lunardi but the NCAA did not approve it. [/QUOTE]