Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
Thamel article on noel
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="HoustonCuse, post: 222776, member: 87"] Ancillary evidence can point you to conclusions without direct knowledge of something. I've always looked at it like this: We can deduce that a time machine will never be invented at any point in the future of human history. How can I tell the future? Because if a time machine is created at any point in the future, there is no way that it wouldn't have traveled back to a point in our past and thus we would know about it. Since we have no evidence of this happening - we can conclude no time machine will ever be built. On to college recruiting. You could always tell that no programs were cheating in recruiting (I mean egregiously) because no one program was sucking in all the top rated recruits year after year. This means all major programs cheated on a relatively equal basis or that severe cheating was largely an overblown drama created by fans. Thus, no special advantage really existed anywhere. If it did, we would see the top 5 recruits every year magically appear at one school. Well it just never happened - look back through the years and of course teams got good recruits but there was no glaring gravitational pull that sucked in every single top guy. But now... I present to you the University of Kentucky. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
Thamel article on noel
Top
Bottom