Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Townie72, post: 2851099, member: 780"] Ive heard that before. But I have also read th BC explanation. BC all along said what it That would be a nice take, if that was what happened. When Fr. Leahey and BC committed to the Big East it was a QUALIFIED commitment. What Healey said every single time was that BC was not interested in hybrid, greatly expanded Big East. When the Big East said it was going to do exactly what Healey said BC could not accept it made that commitment null and void. Teh anti-BC crowd likes to forget and or ignore the full text of BC's so-called commitment. It wasn't a "WE will be with you regardless". It was a "We are with you as long as you don't do this". You can believe who you want on this. As for me, I'm sticking with the Jesuit priest. [/QUOTE]