Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="rrlbees, post: 527641, member: 96"] Your original post is generally a good post but there are some things that aren't as simple or clear as portrayed by your source or they are just lost in the many moving parts. SU is not paying for the facility. Without the seed money and a capital campaign that was viable, there would be no ground breaking. You will see a large fundraising effort. Marrone also had nothing to do with people stepping up. The problem since the 90's that OPA talks about have been a fundraising issue not an issue of SU spending money. In the end, I bet SU spends very little of their own money on the IPF. Just like the manley reno, they raised $4m of the $5m cost and are still trying to raise the rest. Sent using my Commodore 64 on Tapatalk 5.3 [/QUOTE]