Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="omniorange, post: 2699655, member: 636"] Just want to remind you that back in the day, you first advocated for the ACC to take WVU and Rutgers and then later modified that to WVU and Pittsburgh (mainly because of that storied rivalry). You never wanted Syracuse, using the old private versus public argument and the belief that Syracuse would never right the ship so to speak. I understood where you were coming from but kept pointing out that Syracuse and Pitt would be the choices simply because Syracuse was "next up" and Pitt was greater historically and in terms of academics than either WVU or Rutgers. ;) Glad to see you have come around, at least in terms of why Rutgers would have been a disastrous choice. I still hope someday the ACC gives up on the fool's gold of ND and/or Texas (outside of partial membership) and gets WVU to join the party. Cheers, Neil [/QUOTE]