Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="money3189, post: 4280064, member: 436"] That’s not true. Through the years I’ve seen several prospects given a 2 star and weren’t reevaluated after improved camp performances and good senior films. Questionable evaluations. Cuse lean Eric King was way better than their commit John Stone at the rivals camp Stone has been stinking it up at camps. I have proof because he was dropped from a 5.7 to a 5.6. How does he have the same rating as King when King was proven to be better at the same camp? Also Dohn waited 2 months to evaluate Perry and Clement. Emails were sent to his supervisor and that’s when he finally rated them. Dohn evaluates rutgers commits that were previously unranked within a week or so and immediately makes them a border line 4 star and top 5 in NYS. Also, why isn’t NJ prospect Josh Richards evaluated? Probably because he knows he’s a Cuse lean. [/QUOTE]