Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="DeGrozz, post: 2752298, member: 205"] Holy cow, I just checked out their board. There's a guy that is seriously arguing that Rutgers and Syracuse are basically the same historically. Rutgers is a .500 team historically and spent 75% of their history playing pee-wee football (ironically, if they were currently still playing pee-wee football they'd probably also be .500). Meanwhile we are ~200 or so games above .500 and have been playing big boy football for our entire history. Forget about national championships, Heisman winners, bowl appearances, bowl records, NFL HOFers, the greatest player ever, etc. It's not even close. And no, playing a soccer game (not that there's anything wrong with that) in 1869 doesn't make you relevant. But my favorite thing of all is that their crowning achievement is winning the Texas Bowl... which Scott Schafer also won. [/QUOTE]