Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="1959champs, post: 4312949, member: 8626"] Not that the study was accurate in the least, but I guess that the Big 10 must have done some “feasibility study” in 2012 and somehow concluded that Rutgers actually had net positive value for the conference. (Unless you think that adding Rutgers and Maryland was actually a move to give Penn State some East Coast partners and prevent PSU from joining the ACC) Then again, there’s been a lot of cord cutting over the last decade, and there will be even more cord cutting in the future. That decreases the Big 10’s ability to charge ridiculous fees for the NYC TVs that aren’t actually tuned into Rutgers football. I’m skeptical that Rutgers ever actually had net positive value for the Big Ten to begin with. But I think there’s a 0% chance that Rutgers has net positive value for the conference now. [/QUOTE]