Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="HtownOrange, post: 4178039, member: 622"]
Wait  until you see where our starters are from...

Title IX is a problem, but the P5 have no legitimate argument when each conference rakes in far more money that the other conferences.  The actual costs are very small in the big picture.  Besides, if Rutgers can afford to lose $73MM annually while funding lacrosse, then the remaining schools can lose a little on lacrosse.  Besides, most schools don't field women's lacrosse teams, starting up both makes Title IX moot (unless you are GATech and need another men's sport because the ratio favors men).

Anyway, if the B1G is really looking $100MM payouts, then each schools should be forced - by their conference - to field baseball/softball, lacrosse (m/w teams), and hockey (m/w teams).  The SEC should do likewise, though they should have another option for hockey, just sayin'...  The ACC being a bit behind, should require each school field a lacrosse team (and baseball, yes, SU, I am looking at you!).  After all, this is about educating people, not about making money...*

*the preceding paragraph was written in sarcastic font for those who may lack a "sarcasm font" on their device.)
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?