Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="CaptainJ, post: 1236134, member: 1553"]
NM (I know some folks dont prefer my longer posts, and I always found the "NM" OPs to be somewhat amusing being I haven't seen it done elsewhere)

Actually,I have changed my mind and will have to save my first "NM" post for another time. I am [B]still [/B]frustrated by the officiating.  Fix or not, is it at all possible to have something that will hold refs more accountable?  I understand human error, but in cases where it seems incredibly one sided, it would be nice if the officiating got a closer review.  Maybe some warnings could be given, and possibly some sort of punitive action if a certain threshold of tolerance were crossed.  Maybe the one-sided  officiating was entirely chance, but even if that were more likely, I still find it unacceptable.  I'm not suggesting the outcome to be altered, but I feel even a slight deterrent could have resulted in a victory for SU.  If this question has been answered elsewhere, I reckon you can just revert to the originally intended NM if you prefer.  I've never been on a board that used the word "side" nearly as much as this one, so I was paying tribute by mentioning one of my own(well not mine personally, it's a collective thing).
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?