Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="TrickySU, post: 876289, member: 2749"]
Maybe Auburn deserved to play in it, but if they did then we'd be saying Oklahoma deserved it instead. Like I said, back in 2004 I thought Auburn should've been in. I would've loved to see a USC/Auburn title game too. The argument though isn't whether it should've been Oklahoma or Auburn, the argument is that the best team won. USC was the best team in 2004. The BCS didn't give Auburn their shot, but USC was the dominant team in college football that year.

I was actually 9 at the time haha. But, I was still old enough to remember that year. I watched every BCS bowl and plenty of other bowls. I saw Auburn play well in their game. They were a good team. Then, I watched a USC team completely destroy an Oklahoma team that was only giving up 17 points per game. USC was dominant on all levels. Matt Leinart, Reggie Bush, LenDale White, Dwayne Jarrett, and Steve Smith on offense and Lawrence Jackson, Mike Patterson, Shaun Cody, and Lofa Tatupu on defense.

Plus, that USC team is called the best team of the decade.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?