Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Cusefan69, post: 3079929, member: 5764"]
I have no legal backing to this opinion from a court decision standpoint but as an educated guess I would think you would need to make a case that you are changing 45% to 55% of the building to make a legitimate case.  Carrier maybe would argue that by just only changing the roof and locker rooms that the changes are not “material enough “ to constitute a change of the dome to something completely different.  For example if you paint your house, refurb your bathroom and build a new roof, is the house completely changed?  As it correlates to the Dome, Carrier would say no your house (Dome) didn’t change enough,it’s still a 5 bedroom, 3 bath house.(Dome is same foundation, capacity and structure).  I know it may not be a great example but it is intended for illustration.  I don’t know if there is a magic number (percentage) or not from a courts standpoint.  
Another data point.  For Made in America, the Federal rules of Procurement require 50% of the parts to be made in America.  Someone with FAR/DFAR keep me honest there.  So maybe another way to think about the percentage of something.
Again just thinking out loud.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?