Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="NKR1978, post: 3080274, member: 186"] Those online inflation calculators estimate 2.75m in 1979 is equivalent to close to 10m today. SU might have to eat a good chunk of the first naming rights deal, but the damages would be limited. This isn't a legal opinion, but should Carrier argue that they're losing the advertisement/brand awareness because of the prominence of the Dome on TV then it kind of belies their argument that the "donation" was pure charity. [/QUOTE]