Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Alsacs, post: 1553591, member: 652"] I would agree with this. I think because of the news we got if no change is made Coyle's hands were tied rather than him owning SS if he keeps him. It would be disappointing if the Chancellor/BOT put the AD in this position but atleast I can retain confidence in the AD knowing his hands are tied. I just wouldn't understand why the BOT/Chancellor would be willingly to spend such a high amount on a renovation but wouldn't spend another 3 million dollars on a new staff. It just stinks as SS would need more money to retain the status quo. If SS had two more years on this contract atleast the AD would have something to spin as to why there is no change but giving 14-23 more money is just crazy. [/QUOTE]