Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="obliterata, post: 2117127, member: 1167"] During the show one of the reasons they gave for not giving SU a bid was SU's record versus the rest of the teams in the tournament - the field. That's actually not a very good reason, I have no idea why they said that. Here's proof (record is vs multiple bid conferences in the field only): SU... 5-8 (.385) MichSt 5-9 (.357) - 9 seed KSt...4-9 (.308) Ark... 3-7 (.300) - 8 seed Xav...5-12 (.294) WF...4-10 (.286) Miami 4-10 (.286) - 8 seed SCar... 2-5 (.286) - 7 seed USC...2-6 (.250) StM's.. 1-3 (.250) - 7 seed This is one of the many pro-SU stats and they're saying it's a negative, it's mind-boggling. They can't see how a simple thing like this is a plus for SU and everyone's supposed to trust they'll reach valid conclusions while going through all kinds of data. Not me. [/QUOTE]