Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="upperdeck, post: 3988675, member: 474"]
I get it.. they were more likely a team that should have been 2-2 than 0-4 but things broke against them.   Played well enough to be 3-2 not really 1-4..   so 1-4 in the small things

just go around the ACC in our side.

SU has played well enough to be 5-0 is 3-2 and could easily 2-3.  so 1-2

Lots of teams in that same boat. with games that came down to small things

Clemson is 3-2.   could with a couple small breaks be 5-0.  could also be 1-4  . I mean they had 2 goal line stands to win games.   so 2-2 in the small things

NC st is 4-1.     They won the 2 games at the end to not be 2-3..    2-0 in the small things

wake 5-0 1-0 in the small things

Lou  3-2.   2-1 in the small things

BC 4-1  1-1 in the small things

You let games be close the small things matter even more..

But in having watched almost every one of these games.  How many of the small things came down to plays on the field vs plays by the refs/replay judges that changed the game?

in one game they messed up a clock reset, they didnt review a catch, they missed the most obvious of holds and they missed a call on the goal line and they messed up a roughing call and never even really showed the FSU one that was far more contact and later.

SU added to it by making its own mistakes.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?