Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
the game completely changed when Ollie went small
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Cheriehoop, post: 1018607, member: 127"] I guess I don't understand how zone is a crucial factor in dictating tempo unless we were losing the rebounding margin but we didn't. I wish there was a stat for our offensive rebound % converted to a score - bet that stat wouldn't have been pretty. I also don't see how it would limit lineup flexibility because regardless of the type of defense man or zone, any coach's job would always be to judge if a players' offensive ability would overcome their defensive liability or visa-versa. We played zone in 2009-2010 and averaged 80 points a game, we averaged a low of 68 points this year. Teams have decided to play deliberate ball against us because our zone is so good that they don't want to challenge us in a running game. The only constant below is that we played zone exclusively yet look at the average scoring variations. If we have scorers we score in the zone. We have lacked balanced scoring options the past 2 years and depended on defense. This year we ranked 199 in D1 scoring offense(uggh) but #55 in scoring defense. Makes me wonder how we would have done this year if we had just had an more average D1 offense fg% around 44.5%. I feel like a poor excuse for SWC with these stats:cool: [U][B]YEAR SU SCORE OPP SCORE MARGIN SU FG% OPP FG%[/B][/U] 2013-2014 68.0 59.2 8.8 .437 .410 2012-2013 70.4 58.7 11.7 .439 .369 2011-2012 74.1 61.0 13.1 .467 .385 2010-2011 73.4 63.3 10.1 .472 .394 2009-2010 80.9 66.4 14.5 .516 .398 2008-2009 80.2 71.7 8.5 .487 .411 We were 8th in TO margin, 19th in team steals, 54th in rebounding margin. Our defense was fine( 3 point fg% defense needs improvement) but our offense this year was putrid(199th in D1). If we had shot our normally poor .439 shooting % instead of our ridiculously horrid .389 against Dayton we would have won - but regardless for how long being such a poor offensive team? If you look at the NCAA's stats on fg% they have been on a downward trend since the 3 point shot has been introduced.(58.7% n 1987 down to 43.6% in 2011) In fact 3 point% has been decreasing too. 1987-38.4%: 1997-34%: 2007-35%: 2011- 34.5%(moved a foot back in 2008). Bet that has played greatly in JB's belief in the zone. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
the game completely changed when Ollie went small
Top
Bottom