DoctorBombay
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 9,639
- Like
- 26,958
Firstly, yesterday was a stark reminder of a time that I'd honestly thought the SU program had moved beyond. Namely, the penchant to come up small in huge settings, and especially against Georgetown.
I'm from the generation that saw "Manley Fieldhouse is officially closed", the emnity that because the GT-SU rivalry, and the early JB years where he simply "couldn't win the big one".
Yesterday brought all that back in folds!
In 2010 the Wes/Andy team was playing Nova before a record crowd for the BE reg season championship. I had a twinge of "big game" apprehension, because I fully expected SU to "spit the bit", and was prepared to face that eventuality. We of course won the game and I thought to myself, maybe we've gotten over that kinda persistant road-bump...as a program.
Yesterday, against that foe, under those circumstances, restored my doubts to new heights, unfortunately.
We may hold the overall lead in the GT-SU series, but Georgetown ALWAYS wins the bigger matchups, the ones that count the most, the ones we can't ever have back.
We'll never get over JTII, and now we can add the 84' BET, GMac's last game loss to Nova, Walter Berry's block of Pearl, and now this BE series finale at the Dome before 35000+ to that long, maddening list.
It saddens me to no end but the truth is the truth. More often then not, we come up small in big games.
GMac single-handedly wins the BET, and we flame out in the 1st Round. By contrast, Kemba wins the BET the same way, and UConn goes on to take the whole enchilada.
Bitter, upsetting, perplexing....all that, and more.
I rant often against the "Syracuse Inferiority Complex" that sometimes surfaces on this board, but at times like these, it almost becomes understandable.
Again, I'm not saying we're not worthy of our stature or that other programs don't lose big games. I'm saying that I have seen US do so on a fairly consistent basis, for over 30 years now.
Some of it is to be expected, but its seemed to happen more against that team (Georgetown), then against anyone else...and that just sucks!
End rant.
I'm from the generation that saw "Manley Fieldhouse is officially closed", the emnity that because the GT-SU rivalry, and the early JB years where he simply "couldn't win the big one".
Yesterday brought all that back in folds!
In 2010 the Wes/Andy team was playing Nova before a record crowd for the BE reg season championship. I had a twinge of "big game" apprehension, because I fully expected SU to "spit the bit", and was prepared to face that eventuality. We of course won the game and I thought to myself, maybe we've gotten over that kinda persistant road-bump...as a program.
Yesterday, against that foe, under those circumstances, restored my doubts to new heights, unfortunately.
We may hold the overall lead in the GT-SU series, but Georgetown ALWAYS wins the bigger matchups, the ones that count the most, the ones we can't ever have back.
We'll never get over JTII, and now we can add the 84' BET, GMac's last game loss to Nova, Walter Berry's block of Pearl, and now this BE series finale at the Dome before 35000+ to that long, maddening list.
It saddens me to no end but the truth is the truth. More often then not, we come up small in big games.
GMac single-handedly wins the BET, and we flame out in the 1st Round. By contrast, Kemba wins the BET the same way, and UConn goes on to take the whole enchilada.
Bitter, upsetting, perplexing....all that, and more.
I rant often against the "Syracuse Inferiority Complex" that sometimes surfaces on this board, but at times like these, it almost becomes understandable.
Again, I'm not saying we're not worthy of our stature or that other programs don't lose big games. I'm saying that I have seen US do so on a fairly consistent basis, for over 30 years now.
Some of it is to be expected, but its seemed to happen more against that team (Georgetown), then against anyone else...and that just sucks!
End rant.