Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="sufandu, post: 3604338, member: 874"] At first I was thinking there is no way Cincinatti should be top 10. Then I read the blurb and understand why they are, even if I don't agree with it. It's interesting how people want to complain that UConn fans want to ignore college basketball history before 1990 but it seems we are wanting to ignore Cincinatti's history from the 50's and 60's. My criticism of the list is that regular season and NIT titles are too heavily weighted. There is too much variation from league to league to weight it that heavily and some schools were independent far longer than others. Titles from the B1G, ACC, or old Big East are way more valuable than many other conferences. NIT titles should not be weighted as heavily as elite 8's. If you change the weight of the regular season titles, that probably knocks Cincinatti out of the top 10 and puts us in, but it's still close. [/QUOTE]