It's pretty bizarre. It's also indicative of how flat college hoops is. There's virtually no diff between no. 1 and no. 35.Is it really that bizarre? I mean Kentucky is just as talented as any other team and Uconn did beat Florida this year so they weren't a slouch.
Over a 7 game series, even a 5 and probably a 3 game series there would be but in a gimmicky one and done format, there's not enough difference to seperate anyone.It's pretty bizarre. It's also indicative of how flat college hoops is. There's virtually no diff between no. 1 and no. 35.
Well yeah...exactly. That's why the NCAA tourney can't be the end all be all. Are we really willing to put Uconn in duke land?Over a 7 game series, even a 5 and probably a 3 game series there would be but in a gimmicky one and done format, there's not enough difference to seperate anyone.
Oh come on. If we're going to discuss let's be adults. We beat up on a lot more than Colgate...if you're going to stick to that I just give up in advance.What is the end all be all then? If it's not the tournament it surely isn't beating up and racking up wins against Colgate type teams.
Well...I mean if Titles rule... If they win Monday aren't they the same? (Why titles are a silly measure by itself).Duke land?
You're funny.
Well...I mean if Titles rule... If they win Monday aren't they the same? (Why titles are a silly measure by itself).
AZOrange said:Oh come on. If we're going to discuss let's be adults. We beat up on a lot more than Colgate...if you're going to stick to that I just give up in advance. It's subjective IMO. And that's why I don't spend a lot of time comparing programs. People that use the tourney yo hammer/vault teams or conferences are just being silly based on one game results. Kansas healthy beats Uconn 9.9 out of 10 times.
Ok so duke and Uconn are on the same level program wise? Cuse - Florida are too?Come on. This is something fans say when their team doesn't have many titles. No program in America who has multiple titles would trade places with us. Zero.
Discounting titles directly was the Red Sox thing to do before a few years ago. But in all reality it is important.
I love the Orange and will support them all the time but it's a little crazy that Uconn could have three titles since our last one.
No Melo, no AO, I get it. But I'm sick of excuses, there's no reason would couldn't have at least one in 11 years. We have too much talent and a hall of fame coach.
Come on. This is something fans say when their team doesn't have many titles. No program in America who has multiple titles would trade places with us. Zero.
yeah if Yukon wins Monday how are they not as good as duke?Well...I mean if Titles rule... If they win Monday aren't they the same? (Why titles are a silly measure by itself).
First you need to stop comparing professional and collegiate titles. The effects of 5-7 game sets is enormous.Discounting titles directly was the Red Sox thing to do before a few years ago. But in all reality it is important.
I love the Orange and will support them all the time but it's a little crazy that Uconn could have three titles since our last one.
No Melo, no AO, I get it. But I'm sick of excuses, there's no reason would couldn't have at least one in 11 years. We have too much talent and a hall of fame coach.
Ok so duke and Uconn are on the same level program wise? Cuse - Florida are too?
I don't care if they use titles to judge. But if that's the measure they are every bit their equal. Seems a bit odd. I mean if butler had won their 2 games they would be on par program wise with all the giants?yeah if Yukon wins Monday how are they not as good as duke?
AZOrange said:First you need to stop comparing professional and collegiate titles. The effects of 5-7 game sets is enormous. Second, if Uconn wins they would have 2 titles before all but Kentucky and Ville had their last. So what? Uconns coach isn't even the same since the last one. It's just random.