Sgt Cuse
All Conference
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2011
- Messages
- 2,104
- Like
- 1,933
It first sounded to me like the court size thing. But the announcers seemed to be saying it seriously though.
If it is true, wouldn't things need to be adjusted. Maybe SU at home has tight rims, if so:
Does this help hinder our opponents 3 pt %? Is this part of our home court advantage? Our zone sucks teams into the outside shot which is harder with the tight rims in the dome.
Does this help account for our poor FT %? And help explain SWC's findings of overall down FT%? Remember SWC's extensive look at our vs opponent FT % and how there wasn't much difference.
Shouldn't there be a rim tension measure? Shouldn't it be disclosed. What about mandating a range or uniformity to it? Or what about the NCAA loosening it up all over for more O overall?
Is the Carrier dome really like bowling on extra oily lanes. Or golfing at a substantially harder course? Is our defense designed for the tighter rims?
If it is true, wouldn't things need to be adjusted. Maybe SU at home has tight rims, if so:
Does this help hinder our opponents 3 pt %? Is this part of our home court advantage? Our zone sucks teams into the outside shot which is harder with the tight rims in the dome.
Does this help account for our poor FT %? And help explain SWC's findings of overall down FT%? Remember SWC's extensive look at our vs opponent FT % and how there wasn't much difference.
Shouldn't there be a rim tension measure? Shouldn't it be disclosed. What about mandating a range or uniformity to it? Or what about the NCAA loosening it up all over for more O overall?
Is the Carrier dome really like bowling on extra oily lanes. Or golfing at a substantially harder course? Is our defense designed for the tighter rims?