Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="SWC75, post: 2289035, member: 289"]
I suppose anyone with an opinion is 'bias' and their viewpoint is 'skewed'. That's not an argument against anything they might say.

I think we could still stretch the defense doing that and run the ball better. Yous till have 3 1/2 receivers. And we could switch to a one-back set or an empty backfield when we wanted to. If you can switch from one back to no back, you can switch to two backs as well. Neal's one big play was when he was sent out for a pass, Lenny Moore style. Extra receivers make the passing game more sophisticated but fewer running backs make the running game more primitive and sending the same guy up the middle on every running play is neanderthal.

We eon't have to have 200/200, (although I suspect that we've score a lot more than 30 points when we did that over the years). We need to establish capabilities. And right now, we don't have a capability to to run the ball from the running back position. And I'll guarantee you Dino wants to be able to do that.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?