The Upside- Wake Forest | Syracusefan.com

The Upside- Wake Forest

SWC75

Bored Historian
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
34,510
Like
67,187
- Wake Forest to me was kind of this decade’s Rutgers for Syracuse. The Scarlet Knights, back in the Big East days, were the conference’s most pathetic football program. Then, they suddenly got good when we suddenly got bad and their success seemed to rub our demise in all the more. When we first joined the ACC, the Deacons were the one team we could always count on being better than. We hired Dino Babers to get our program going again after many years of frustration. Then we went down there two years ago to play them in a hurricane. We still expected to get our usual victory over them, hurricane or no hurricane. But they dominated 9-28. Must have bene the hurricane. Except we went 4-8 and they went 7-6 and won a bowl game. Last year we had them down 38-24 at halftime in the Dome. Then they rolled us, 5-40 in the second half. They wound up gaining 743 yards. They also wound up 8-5 and beat Texas A&M in a bowl game, (Koda Davis got a little revenge today). If the guy everybody in the neighborhood can beat up beats you up, it’s hard to deal with that. (I’ve been there.). Today they were primed to ruin our best season in years. We got off to a slow start on offense, fell behind 0-10, slowly took control of the game and built a 28-10 lead. Suddenly we couldn’t stop them. We traded scores. Then we had to punt…and then the defense resurrected itself, the offense built the lead back up to 41-24 and bled the clock. The defense got the stop at the end and we’d beaten Wake after two very frustrating games against them the last two years. It was a decisive win but very far from an easy one and that made it even better than if it had been easy. Good pitchers still when they didn’t have their best stuff- and so do good football teams.

- We also overcame the referees who let at least five clear pass interference or defensive holding plays go – and those are just the ones we saw. No wonder Eric Dungy kept looking for open receivers and could not find one.

- They wouldn’t give us the pass, (“they” being Wake and the refs), so we ran the ball down their throats, with Eric Dungey, who is the size of an old-fashioned fullback being the biggest weapon with 24 carries for 135 and a 26 yard score. He also completed 23 of 35 passes for 157 touch yards. But the biggest thing was that he and we had no turnovers.

- That plus the 3 takeaways the defense got makes up +12 on the season – this after being -12 last year. That’s the biggest difference between 4-8 and 7-2.

- It was an interesting chess match. We had 6 sacks in the first half and none in the second because Wake went to the bubble screen look and the running attack. The blocking schemes obviously changed and wake started going down the field. Then we made some adjustments and began to stop them and take the ball away in the fourth quarter. We did the same thing on offense, reacting to what Dino called a “light box” to run for 264 yards and hit some bubble screens of our own. Only we kept scoring.

- Sterling Hofrichter’s punting varied, kicking Aussie-style and into the wind half the game. But he had 8 touchbacks on 8 kickoffs against the dangerous Dortch.

- Props to Alton Robinson, who in the coach’s words, “played himself into exhaustion”, getting 4 TFLs, 1 sack and many pressures.

- Also to the hobble Chris Fredrick, who made the athletic interception that clinched the game and then took the tour around the stadium, tossing the ball into the stands to SU fans. It was a dumb thing to do but I understand how he felt.

- And kudos to me for coming up with this one in the chat room: “When was the last time we were 7-2?” “Ask Chukwu.”

7-2 with 4 to go.

LET’S GO ORANGE!!!
 
Always appreciate the write-ups (both takes), but noted the personal back story you touched upon in the first paragraph. I was sorry to have read that, but given what you bring to the forums, I suspect you have risen well above that, and may have used it to become the person that you are (at least, as far as I can surmise from your numerous, thoughtful and informative posts). Thanks for being you, SWC75.
 
In last year's beatdown (a 64-43 loss at the Dome), Matt Colburn ran for 237 yards and 2 TDs.
Today, Colburn got 67 yards and no TDs.

Sam Hartman got a lot of yards but SU's D kept WF's leading RB in check.
 
Always appreciate the write-ups (both takes), but noted the personal back story you touched upon in the first paragraph. I was sorry to have read that, but given what you bring to the forums, I suspect you have risen well above that, and may have used it to become the person that you are (at least, as far as I can surmise from your numerous, thoughtful and informative posts). Thanks for being you, SWC75.


I don't think that was just a personal back story. I think it's the reason for the Rutgers dumpster fire thread.
 
The best part is that it will be another two years before I have to listen to that obnoxious WAKE FOREST, WAKE FOREST ... promo on the ESPN stream.
 
I agree with what you said and enjoy your analysis and takes. Your history is top shelf.

My only concern is that you mentioned Wake Forest and Rutgers in the same vein. I agree that Wake appeared good while we were bad and they appear bad now when we are good, I hope you are not relegating Wake to Rutgers status. 1) Nobody deserves Rutgers status except Rutgers; 2) Wake is a respectable university run in a respectable way; 3) Wake has yet to pull some of the most stupid stunts in efforts to become a winner; 4) Wake has not mortgaged the future of the state with wasted investment, as a Private School, they, like SU, pay their own way.
 
I guess what Babers meant by "taking away the pass" it was his way of saying that the Wake guys could hold the SU receivers and not get called for it.

That's definitely the most effective way of "taking away the pass". :rolleyes:
 
The best part is that it will be another two years before I have to listen to that obnoxious WAKE FOREST, WAKE FOREST ... promo on the ESPN stream.
Totally agree! And we’re not “typical bottom feeders” anymore! You were right at the time but it always stuck with me. Haha
 
In last year's beatdown (a 64-43 loss at the Dome), Matt Colburn ran for 237 yards and 2 TDs.
Today, Colburn got 67 yards and no TDs.

Sam Hartman got a lot of yards but SU's D kept WF's leading RB in check.

I was really impressed with the run defense, particularly from the line. Just seemed like they weren't getting moved around at all, and the entire job of stopping the run wasn't left to the LBs and safeties.

So refreshing for that to happen on the road in November against a team that just rushed for 368 the week before (against air, I know).
 

Forum statistics

Threads
172,035
Messages
4,990,456
Members
6,021
Latest member
OldeOstrom

Online statistics

Members online
210
Guests online
2,954
Total visitors
3,164


...
Top Bottom