Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="007, post: 2884330, member: 393"] Agree completely. The lack of any semblance of an interior scoring threat (doesn't even need to be big numbers, just the threat would be enough) is a major contributing factor. Especially when you play against the VT style of D - intense ball pressure, exaggerated help (this was huge), exaggerated hedging, all while [B]attacking[/B] any dribble penetration and switching on all screens (also huge). It was a recipe for disaster for SU. The worse possible way to attack that style D is by setting ball screens with our offensively challenged bigs, especially near the sidelines. This took away a big part of the motion style offense. And VT's extreme help rotations took away the iso dribble penetration. [/QUOTE]