Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Cuse_1999, post: 83459, member: 1499"] If Davis indicated to the PS in 2003 that Lang probably was molested also, we can safely assume he also supplied Lang's name to ESPN in 2003. That means ESPN probably interviewed Lang back then and he denied being molested. Fast forward 8 years and Lang now says to ESPN that he was molested. OK fine, ESPN has their 2nd source and can run with the story. But shouldn't they at least acknowledge that Lang denied abuse to them in 2003 before switching his story in 2011. Mark Schwartz and his one sided reporting. [/QUOTE]