Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="omniorange, post: 1078687, member: 636"] I think the play back in 2002/2003 probably should have been Miami, BC, SU, Pitt, and VT. No need to take either Rutgers or UConn at that time. Wait a year or two and see if ND and/or PSU might bite. If they didn't then come back for two of WVU, RU, and UConn. Northeast popularity in football is just so wound up in PSU and ND, a conference has to have at least one of them to truly have a shot of representing the area. And preferably both. In 2011 the ACC was already in a position of weakness and the moves made were more about staying relevant than about true vision. Cheers, Neil [/QUOTE]