Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="DomeHolmes, post: 5593169, member: 10113"] This also illustrates what a joke NET is. They have mostly the same resume as us (with a bad loss to top 15 team, and 4 cupcake wins). But we have a top 15 win and 3 top 25 losses and they have a 4 top 25 losses. They are 39. We are 70. As the flaws in the net rankings become more and more apparent, hopefully the committee starts to refer back to “who did you play? Who did you beat?” I saw the same thing with RPI. The first few years, it was “the” metric and was not questioned by the committee. Then the flaws were too many to ignore. Same with NET. last year there was more emphasis on quality of schedule according to the committee. [/QUOTE]