Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 5595613, member: 1969"] We had the RPI that tried to do that before and it spit out a lot of junk. Its hard to measure 365 teams without bringing in margin into play, and things like KP and NET are probably ranking teams better at the end. But its still flawed. I have a few potential solutions for a revamped NET that I think would be better based on what I have learned as the flaws and strengths of various systems. I'm intrigued by Bartorvik's Quality of Record metric that only focuses on W-L, but even that one has to have a margin based system influencing it to a degree from behind it to not spit out total jibberish.. but that's OK if sone properly. I'll expand on those tomorrow or tonight. [/QUOTE]