What in Gods name are you seeing. I am 5'8" and I could have scored 30 points in the paint against this lame post defense tonight. You picked THIS game to post that opinion? Wow!simple rating system (schedule adjusted point differential) is better this year than
76-77
77-78
03-04
84-85
97-98
05-06
83-84
00-01
91-92
simple rating system (schedule adjusted point differential) is better this year than
76-77
77-78
03-04
84-85
97-98
05-06
83-84
00-01
91-92
I'm sorry I said they're good. You on the other hand are terribleWhat in Gods name are you seeing. I am 5'8" and I could have scored 30 points in the paint against this lame post defense tonight. You picked THIS game to post that opinion? Wow!
It was a great shooting team. Not a good rebounding or defensive team.
This team was solid and an NCAAT team once they
made John Gillon the starting PG over Frank Howard.
Point differential weighted by your opponents point differential. The Simple Rating System: Bringing order (kinda) to chaos | Smart FootballYeahhhh, so this ranking makes me think the system is seriously flawed.
i can't believe that SU isn't ranked higher in three point shooting. i haven't found the stats on this but i think shooting has gotten so much better across the board that syracuse's improvement doesn't mean as much. 4 guys shooting 37% is impressive. tough time rebounding and finishing inside.They could make FTs and shoot well that's it. Not that they deserved a bid, but it is SO bizarre that Boeheim's best shooting and FT team isn't in the Tourney.