Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="JeremyCuse, post: 2499201, member: 43"]
Thanks Sholokov.

A few quick responses to your post.
I don't have an issue adding Rutgers or Navy to the schedule but this young team I don't see the need to add both. With a team this young you need a few building block games where these guys can get there feet under them and we can get some of these younger guys extended PT. It also helps the W/L record which could be in danger of being under .500 with this schedule.

In regards to the offense I don't think I called for wholesale changes. I think moving Bomberry back to the 1st midline bumping dearth back and then Seebold to the starting attack is pretty minimal. If your taking into consideration mixing up the second line as well then I guess you could be right but I think the starting 6 nearly stays in tacked as the only real change is Seebold in and Dearth out.

I agree 100% that this is going to be a very up and down season from an offensvie perspective and there's going to be some very trying moments. I would just like to see the staff embrace the youth at this point and run as many of them out there if the competition between them and the incumbent starter is negligible. At this point putting Lipka and Quinn on the second line over Simmons and Lane or at least one of the two, would help usher in that youth movement as Simmons and Lane are just to inconsistent as seniors at this point.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?